LinkedIn Visibility Surge: Women Find Success When Pretending to be Men
Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?
Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.
The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach
Numerous women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.
Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.
Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.
Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Platform Response
Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.
"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.
Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.
The Process
- Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
- Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language
The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.
The Downside
Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.
"Before, my content were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."
She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."
Varying Outcomes
Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.
"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.
Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.
System Details
Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.
The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."
A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.
Evolving Environment
As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.
"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."