🔗 Share this article

Yesterday, the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, delivered a Labour Party economic plan. The public have been asking for Labour’s mission and principles to be more distinctly articulated. Through the decisions made – a transition to a fairer tax system, focusing on wealth to pay for tackling child poverty, quality public services and the cost of living – we have clearly demonstrated what we believe in.

This is why Labour MPs cheered in the Commons, and it’s why we are up for the battles to come. And it’s why the cries from the conservative side began right away.

The Main Political Divide in British Government

The central dividing line in British politics is yet again on the economy. On the one side Labour, who aim to reform it so it helps ordinary working people, and on the other, our political opponents, who support the status quo and the unsuccessful ideology of the past. We must now take on, and win, the argument.

The Tories were given 14 years to fix things and instead, by every standard, they got much worse. Their doctrinaire austerity and trickle-down economics – tax breaks for the wealthy, reducing investment (causing us with low productivity and wages), and failing to support young people post-Covid – proved ineffective.

Record of Decline Under the Previous Administration

Quality of life dropped by the largest margin since records began, child poverty reached record levels, NHS waiting lists in England were the highest they’ve ever been, wages were stagnant, a housing crisis took hold, young people scarred by Covid were left on the scrapheap. The history of failure goes on.

A single budget alone can’t put all this right, so Labour has a comprehensive plan for rebuilding and for rewiring the country. And we have to go out and continue making the argument for why our strategy will yield benefits.

Welfare Spending and Child Poverty

Under the Tories, welfare spending rose substantially. As did child poverty, because they failed to tackle the root causes: low pay, high housing costs, significant inequalities in education, health and regions. The state ends up paying more to deal with the symptoms instead of the cure.

It’s why we are building more social housing than for a generation, increasing wages and new rights for workers, massively boosting investment in infrastructure and new industries, getting waiting lists down and bringing down the costs of childcare and energy as we drive for clean power.

Removing the Two-Child Benefit Cap

It’s also why we are completely justified to use this budget to remove the two-child benefit cap.

For eight long years, since it was introduced, poorer families with children have endured from a unjust social experiment that was branded as fair for working people when it was anything but. Most of the families impacted by it have a parent in work.

It’s done nothing but push 300,000 more children into poverty – which, in the end, costs us more, as well as being callous and immoral.

Tangible Effects in Local Areas

From experience from my own constituency – where over 5,000 children will be lifted out of poverty as a result of abolishing the cap – the actual impact it’s had. Children wearing £1 wellies as school shoes, children going to bed hungry and cold, living in overcrowded, damp homes, parents during the holidays depending on food banks for a simple meal or small gift for their kids.

I also see the impact on schools, teachers, social workers, doctors and charities who are already overburdened but have to divert time and resources to supporting children who are living with the consequences of severe deprivation.

Lasting Effects of Youth Hardship

Just one in four pupils from the most disadvantaged families achieve five good GCSEs, compared with nearly three in four among wealthier families. This predisposes them for the challenges they face during their lives: missed potential, financial struggles and poor health. Children who were raised in poverty are more likely to be jobless or poor as adults.

Addressing child poverty isn’t just a moral imperative, it is a future-oriented strategy. Poverty costs the economy significantly more than the £3bn cost of removing the two-child cap, or extending free school meals.

That’s why we acted urgently in the budget, despite the challenging economic context. Every day with this cap in place sees more than 100 extra children pushed into poverty. The benefits of lifting it won’t happen overnight either, so taking early action in the parliament was crucial.

The cap was a symbol to 14 years of unsuccessful conservative ideology. Now it is gone.

Equitable Financing for Policies

We, as Labour, can also be clear that these measures are being funded in a fair way – from a new gambling levy, closing tax loopholes and a new “mansion tax”.

Conclusion

Fairness and direction – that’s how we will succeed in the contest of ideas. This budget is a clear statement that we gained the election as Labour, and will govern as Labour. As I consistently said during my campaign to become deputy leader, we must seize back the political megaphone and set the agenda more forcefully about what’s truly flawed with the country and how we are repairing it. We’ve certainly done that this week.

So let’s maintain it and prevail in this fight about how we will renew Britain and tackle the deep inequalities impeding progress.